Differences Between Humanistic And Congruent Counselors California

By Michael Evans


One of the most important aspects of counseling is that of congruence. For example, there are now Congruent counselors California working in different areas. As a result, each gets to know one another personally throughout the counseling process.

By focusing on the authentic self, counselor and client often build a closer relationship. In the process, it is often easier for client and therapist to communicate about past and present issues and traumas. Whereas, there are often more guidelines which therapists must follow when it comes humanistic and other forms of counseling. As such, those working in this area are often better when it comes to dealing with issues related to sexual orientation and gender related issues.

In most cases, therapists using this style of counseling allow clients to experience the internal and external experiences of the counselor. Known as the Rogerian approach, it is very popular among individuals whom believe in living in the present moment. Basically, the counselor is working from an authentic position rather than hiding personal details or issues. As a result, the client and counselor get to know each other for whom each is as a person.

The core conditions in this type counseling include demonstrating congruency with regards to client needs, providing clients with unconditional positive approval and being empathetic to needs and understanding. Providing support in ways which are acceptable to both client and counselor throughout the relationship is one of the most important aspects in this type counseling.

By using this person or client centered approach, therapists and clients can often build more honest and trustworthy relationships. One of the main differences between this type counseling and humanistic counseling can be seen in the terminology. For, while most other counseling forms refer to patients, congruent counselors prefer to use the term clients.

Unlike many other treatments and therapies, this method provides individuals the tools necessary to change and improve oneself. As such, it is the individual that is responsible for making any changes rather than the counselor. For, as the counselor and client are equal partners, each are responsible for eliminating and overcoming the obstacles and challenges on an ongoing basis.

In most cases, counselors using this method believe it is better for clients to focus on the present and future rather than past experiences. For, the Rogerian approach works to assist clients in personal growth and eventual self-actualization. As such, those using this method believe it is more beneficial to live in the now rather than the past. Whereas, humanistic and other forms are often based on discovering issues of the past. After which, therapists focus on past issues which were traumatic while providing different forms of treatment.

Ultimately, this type of counseling is more like peer-counseling than humanistic counseling. For, individuals going through this type treatment often become friends with therapists during the process. As a result, not only does the individual find the help one needs to become more aware and self-actualized, clients and therapists often become life-long friends. While this is the case with congruent counseling, those working in traditional therapy are not often allowed to build or carry friendships into the future.




About the Author:



Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire