The world's population seems to be more divided than before between great wealth and abject poverty. The chances of getting ahead if you come from an impoverished background are becoming fewer and fewer. It seems that wealth, privilege, and opportunity are open to only a select group. The opposite of this scenario is social justice. This is the idea that access to the possibility of wealth, opportunity, and privilege should be open to every human being.
The idea that an open society should have the same rules for everybody is a product of the mid-eighteen hundreds. Its first appearance came during civil revolutions that rocked Europe and with the rise of the Industrial Revolution. The focus during this period was on fair distribution of wealth, property, and capital.
In the middle of the twentieth century the idea started to expand. Gender, nationality, race, and environmental equality were included. The concept also expanded from just a governmental responsibility to create an equal society to include personal responsibility for alleviating the unjust conditions suffered by victims all over the world.
The issues that plague the dream of a just society can be broken down into two basic parts. The first is the way society treats certain individuals based solely on personal prejudice, bias, misinformation, and fear. This is where unequal treatment of individuals based on their gender, race, ethnicity, age, religion, education, social status, and physical and mental disabilities, comes in to the picture.
Unjust governmental laws are the second part of the equation. These are law put in place, knowingly or unknowingly, that create conditions that limit, deny, or make it hard for some segments of the population to access opportunities freely given to other segments of the population. Examples of these are voting laws that redistrict certain areas to sway elections in favor of one party and laws that require specific types of identification in order for a person to be allowed into the polling booths.
Laws pertaining to the environment that have loopholes allowing industrial waste to pollute rivers and lakes where communities get their drinking water and pollute the air those communities breathe is an example of injustice condoned by local, state, and federal governments. In the United States, people of specific nationalities and races are more likely to be detained by law enforcement.
Experts break down the ways in which society treats certain individuals unequally into direct and indirect. Direct inequality comes about when people deny certain rights and opportunities to some and not to others. If the owner of a public restaurant bars diners from eating at his establishment based on their sexual orientation, that is direct inequality. Segregated schools and public facilities that deny access to certain individuals with the consent of the government is another example.
Indirect inequality is when governments put laws in place that don't directly inhibit the rights of certain individuals, but in reality do just that. Laws that limit mail in voting and require identifying documentation in order to vote are examples of indirect inequality. Purchasing clothes made in sweatshops have the effect of supporting manufacturers who victimize their workers. You are indirectly condoning this conduct by rewarding it with sales.
The idea that an open society should have the same rules for everybody is a product of the mid-eighteen hundreds. Its first appearance came during civil revolutions that rocked Europe and with the rise of the Industrial Revolution. The focus during this period was on fair distribution of wealth, property, and capital.
In the middle of the twentieth century the idea started to expand. Gender, nationality, race, and environmental equality were included. The concept also expanded from just a governmental responsibility to create an equal society to include personal responsibility for alleviating the unjust conditions suffered by victims all over the world.
The issues that plague the dream of a just society can be broken down into two basic parts. The first is the way society treats certain individuals based solely on personal prejudice, bias, misinformation, and fear. This is where unequal treatment of individuals based on their gender, race, ethnicity, age, religion, education, social status, and physical and mental disabilities, comes in to the picture.
Unjust governmental laws are the second part of the equation. These are law put in place, knowingly or unknowingly, that create conditions that limit, deny, or make it hard for some segments of the population to access opportunities freely given to other segments of the population. Examples of these are voting laws that redistrict certain areas to sway elections in favor of one party and laws that require specific types of identification in order for a person to be allowed into the polling booths.
Laws pertaining to the environment that have loopholes allowing industrial waste to pollute rivers and lakes where communities get their drinking water and pollute the air those communities breathe is an example of injustice condoned by local, state, and federal governments. In the United States, people of specific nationalities and races are more likely to be detained by law enforcement.
Experts break down the ways in which society treats certain individuals unequally into direct and indirect. Direct inequality comes about when people deny certain rights and opportunities to some and not to others. If the owner of a public restaurant bars diners from eating at his establishment based on their sexual orientation, that is direct inequality. Segregated schools and public facilities that deny access to certain individuals with the consent of the government is another example.
Indirect inequality is when governments put laws in place that don't directly inhibit the rights of certain individuals, but in reality do just that. Laws that limit mail in voting and require identifying documentation in order to vote are examples of indirect inequality. Purchasing clothes made in sweatshops have the effect of supporting manufacturers who victimize their workers. You are indirectly condoning this conduct by rewarding it with sales.
About the Author:
When you are looking for information about social justice, come to our web pages online today. More details are available at http://www.one-race.org/about-2 now.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire